Comments for The Irreverent Lawyer

Comment on Spin doctors, sock puppets and the cost to practice law. by alston28

alston28 — Wed, 15 May 2013 18:49:34 +0000

I agree completely (I think) with your views on mandatory cle requirements. I thought the ABA report might shed some additional light on the bloat of the Alabama state bar, but I sure don’t want to pay the ABA for anything.

Comment on After the din, not much will happen to racist email repentant Judge Cebull. by Math-challenged lawyers and unfunny judicial opinions. | The Irreverent Lawyer

Wed, 15 May 2013 03:53:20 +0000

[…] as far as the 9th Circuit is concerned, fulfilling thereby the prognostication: “After the din, not much will happen to racist email repentant Judge Cebull.” […]

Comment on “Use me up!” — Judge McCree and Bill Withers — but not Clarence Carter. by Math-challenged lawyers and unfunny judicial opinions. | The Irreverent Lawyer

Wed, 15 May 2013 03:53:14 +0000

[…] Truth be told, what’s funnier are the instances of unintended humor. […]

Comment on Spin doctors, sock puppets and the cost to practice law. by lawmrh

lawmrh — Sat, 27 Apr 2013 03:17:22 +0000

I didn’t buy the report nor have I obtained a copy, otherwise I would gladly share additional relevant information. I suspect, however, that a print version may be available for perusal in the reference section of a local law library. Let me know, though, if there’s something in particular that you’re interested in and I may be able to ferret out the information online or through a
colleague.

Comment on Spin doctors, sock puppets and the cost to practice law. by alston28

alston28 — Fri, 26 Apr 2013 05:14:30 +0000

Can you make the $75 ABA report available, to your readers, like me, or would that violate some contract you entered into with the ABA when you “bought” it?

Comment on Spin doctors, sock puppets and the cost to practice law. by Christina Waldman

Christina Waldman — Fri, 26 Apr 2013 04:06:38 +0000

And that’s not counting mandatory CLE.

Comment on The discipline of Judge James EnEarl or how the public’s supposedly “protected” by not telling them why. by Mis-Judged

Mis-Judged — Fri, 26 Apr 2013 03:25:04 +0000

In regards to Justice Finally; I have witnessed this husband and wife duo and had mentioned the same to coworkers as they had also witnessed; further more I have been in a case where Judge Enearl refused to allow an appeal to the courts in a case that should have fallen the other way in everyones eyes but his. Makes you wonder what else, or whom else lives he has ruined for his own personal gains. The one case was a Minden resident was killed in an auto accident in CA. and Mrs. Enearl was the so called trusted Public Admin. of his estate which the gentleman owned a large vintage car collection among other property of great value.

Comment on Chasing ambulances? Some say lawyer’s latest ad crosses taste boundaries. by There’s no passing up a good body slam to make a point. | The Irreverent Lawyer

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:41:27 +0000

[...] An obviously enterprising fellow, he must surely warm the gasconading cockles of the hearts of other passionate lawyer advertisers — such as the many “Battling Hammers” – not the least being rapping Lowell “The Hammer” Stanley or of other notable quotable personal injury client hawking luminaries. [...]

Comment on Judge Wade McCree’s “No shame in my game” and Judge Martin McDonald’s “I’ll strangle you.” by There’s no passing up a good body slam to make a point. | The Irreverent Lawyer

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:41:19 +0000

[...] Also see, for instance, Judge Martin McDonald’s “I’ll strangle you.” [...]

Comment on Judicial temperament and choking out justice at the Wisconsin Supreme Court. by There’s no passing up a good body slam to make a point. | The Irreverent Lawyer

Sat, 20 Apr 2013 03:41:08 +0000

[...] time readers know there’s no better way to illustrate judicial body slams, choke-holds and slap-downs than with images from professional [...]